It appears criticisms of WHO's responses to coronavirus outbreak among HKers and china experts largely left unnoticed in wider western audience. Here's a thread recapping some of our criticism of WHO during the peak of the crisis in our region.
Pls note that because of our past experience with SARS abd our proximity to China, HK has been on high alert since early Jan, and almost every average citizen here has been closely following every development of the disease.
Yet WHO issued this travel advisory just a day before on Jan 27. Very casual language, no mention of any quarantine procedures, when should it be performed and how. Only some rudimentary advices on entry/exit screening. https://www.who.int/ith/2019-nCoV_advice_for_international_traffic/en/
It put undue burden on citizens, especially when most ppl elsewhere in the world who haven't been thru this wouldn't have the necessary awareness to judge when face mask is necessary.
There was no clear recommendation on when a community need to begin wearing face mask, when the virus has already spread globally and many cities are at risk of increasing community transmissions.
I'd conclude here by saying this is not a blanket dismissal of WHO, but the public needs to be aware that WHO has been quite behind the curve in its recommendations.

This is not a criticism of their research or reporting work either, but their day-to-day crisis mgmt.
You can follow @goofrider.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: