1/ #Revisiting @FatEmperor view on ratios and LDLc
BOOM! Ivor.
https://meandgin.blogspot.com/2020/02/revisiting-ivors-position-on-ldlc-and.html
My friends asked me to watch Ivor's podcast Chol 101
@DaveKeto @Gearoidmuar @puddleg @JeffryGerberMD @ProfTimNoakes @ZKForTre

2/ #Revisiting Cholesterol 101 podcast @FatEmperor Excellent production. I guess I am Lex Luthor 2 this Irish #Superman I have endured as archenemy of this Irish "root cause" Superman.
He has the attractive and compelling blarney of the Irish but I have the overwhelming data.

3/ #Revisiting Cholesterol 101 podcast Thxs Ivor for updating your position for me. I don't think you put this information in Eat Rich Live Well? What page is it on? How high does the CAC # need 2 B to initiate statin therapy? Again not in the book? @rand18m @TuitNutrition

4/ #RevisitingCholesterol Ivor I know U don't want 2 discuss med Rx. as U R not a Doc. Do U have a podcast where U sit down w a lipidologist 2 discuss when statins, Zetia, Niacin, & ESPECIALLY PCSK9 should B used? Can LDL B 2 low?

5/ #RevisitingCholesterol In response to Ivor's post shown below.
49% of FH patients with CAC zero had CVE.
In your chart on your podcast people without FH who have CAC 0 have 1.4% CVE.
Where is your engineering math now.

6/ #RevisitingCholesterol
Below is the chart your article uses.
In your podcast people w/o FH at CAC 1-100 had 4 % CVE
Pps w FH at CAC 1-100 had 30% CVE

Pps w/o FH had at CAC >100 had 15% CVE in your podcast
Pps w FH at CAC > 100 had 21% CVE

7/ #RevisitingCholesterol
Hope fellow lipidolgists shout out agreement w concern over 101 Cholesterol podcast reposted.
https://meandgin.blogspot.com/2020/02/2020-article-my-comments-in-purple-in.html
@nationallipid @Drlipid @lipiddoc @SethJBaumMD @drpablocorral @PeterAttiaMD @mdavidsonmd @DaveDixonPharmD @braun_lynne @MatthewIto