Thread about Michael Jackson’s innocence:
Firstly, the reason I’m making this thread is because I’m done spending hours arguing with people about this. I’ve been doing this for years (more so in the past 13 months) & it’s easier for me to do it this way. If anyone has any questions, please DM me. My DM’s are always open.
I want to address many misconceptions that people had so I’ll start off with those.
“Why would he pay hush money if he was innocent?”
It was not “hush money” otherwise you wouldn’t know about it! Evan Chandler (Jordan Chandler’s father) asked MJ to pay him $1mil before he spoke about the allegations publicly. MJ refused. Evan then decided to sue MJ.
The money paid by Michael’s insurance company was to settle the civil case. NOT the criminal case. I’m not well versed on law, but what I gathered from my research was that a civil case should not precede a criminal case. But this is what was happening (which is now illegal).
If the civil case had gone on & MJ lost, his entire defence would have been given up. MJ waited until the last minute to reluctantly give his insurance company the green light to pay. He wanted to go on with the criminal case but once the Chandler’s got the money, they went AWOL.
But before any of this had happened, Evan was caught on a leaked tape talking about his plans to extort MJ. Here’s the link:
I’d also like to ask, who in their right mind would accept the fact that their child was molested, accept money and then REFUSE to show up to court to put the alleged molester in jail?
“How come Jordan Chandler was able to accurately describe Michael Jackson’s genitalia?”
This is FALSE and could not be any further from the truth. If this were true, MJ would have been in jail.
The descriptions were based off of stereotypes (about MJ’s religious upbringing and vitiligo) but were completely wrong. You can see this for yourself in the court transcripts which I will link at the end of this thread. These lies were spread by the media.
“Why was child pornography found in MJ’s home?”
This is another lie spread by the media. Possession of child pornography is a crime so he would’ve been in jail if it were true. Adult heterosexual porn was found. That’s it. And this is not a crime.
“What about the maid that had come forward & said that MJ molested those children?”
The same maid who was fired and sued by MJ because she was caught stealing? Hmm. Even if we put that aside, the discrepancies in her testimony are shocking. Read more here: https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2018/05/12/wades-witnesses-part-2/
“An acquittal doesn’t mean anything. OJ was acquitted.”
Anyone who says this statement really shows their ignorance with this one. There were tensions with race around the time of OJ’s trial. Improper mishandling of the infamous glove & other things meant he was acquitted.
The jury for MJ’s criminal case in 2005 (when he was acquitted of all 14 charges) where an almost all white conservative jury. He wasn’t acquitted because of lack of evidence, he was acquitted because of the lies. Which I’ll talk about now.
“Why did MJ have an alarm leading to his bedroom?”
The biggest celebrity in the world at the time who had people living in his closet for days and people parachuting into his home having an alarm leading to his bedroom should not be alarming. All celebrities have alarms.
But since people ask this question, I’ll address it. That alarm actually helped MJ’s acquittal in 2005 when Star Arvizo said he saw his brother being molested in a place where the alarm would have definitely gone off.
“Have you seen the documentary?”
The same documentary where more than 60 lies were told in the space of 4 hours? Not very reliable. Watch this video which debunks it in 30 minutes:
That documentary wasn’t credible at all and I can’t count the number of times I’ve rolled my eyes when people have brought it up. How many lies does it take to make a liar? Saying you were molested in a place that didn’t exist is not “trauma”, it’s a lie. Recognise it as one.
If you have any more questions, this website more than likely has the answer for it, so I would strongly recommend using it to read the court transcripts, other myths which have been debunked and more: https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com 
Danny Wu has also created this amazing documentary which goes into a lot more depth about the 1993 case than I could ever hope to. I’d definitely recommend watching this:
Please don’t @ me or DM me saying something ridiculous like “I saw the pain in the accusers eyes.” or “I know a liar when I see one.”
I am a scientist. I deal with facts. Present them to me or leave me alone.
This is all from what I could remember off the top of my head, if I remember anything else, I’ll be sure to add it to this thread. If you have any specific questions, please DM me. I’m done bringing negativity on my timeline 25/8.
I’ve decided not to block people on this account (I might do though if someone really gets on my nerves). But if there’s one thing that’ll be sure to get you muted, it’s you saying “We’ll have to agree to disagree.” That is NOT how facts work.
I really don’t like misinforming people and I’ve made an error in this thread. It was about the maid, I’m linking the tweet where I’ve been corrected 👍🏿 https://twitter.com/astowill/status/1280980039627087872?s=21 https://twitter.com/astowill/status/1280980039627087872
You can follow @zmjprincess.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: