Read on Twitter
. @SenJohnKennedy You will be attending a confirmation hearing on Thursday for former US Attorney Jessie Liu.
Will you please ask:
"Did the DOJ have evidence in 2018 that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the FISA application used against U.S. person Carter Page?"
Will you please ask:
"Did the DOJ have evidence in 2018 that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the FISA application used against U.S. person Carter Page?"
This single question, and the answer therein that I am certain would follow, would do more to expose the machinery of the Deep State than any other public question.
The ramifications are astronomical to: the DC Deep State, the U.S. media, and the institutions of DOJ and FBI.
The ramifications are astronomical to: the DC Deep State, the U.S. media, and the institutions of DOJ and FBI.
If you have followed any part of the intelligence weaponization against the Trump campaign/administration, think carefully about the downstream consequences within the answer you know to exist.
It is the question that creates the explosion that eventually splits the atom.
It is the question that creates the explosion that eventually splits the atom.
It would prove the media lied for 18 months.
It would prove the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was a participating entity in the coup effort.
It would explain why the SSCI would only approve of nominees who would not expose their activity.
CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, DNI, all require confirmation from a committee (including Chair and Vice-Chair) who were engaged in a seditious conspiracy against the office of the presidency.
CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, DNI, all require confirmation from a committee (including Chair and Vice-Chair) who were engaged in a seditious conspiracy against the office of the presidency.
It would explain how Vice-Chairman Mark Warner's text messages surfaced.
Warner entered the dragnet of the FBI investigation of James Wolfe.... and he was questioned by the FBI about his text messages. THAT is why Warner got out in front of them.
Warner entered the dragnet of the FBI investigation of James Wolfe.... and he was questioned by the FBI about his text messages. THAT is why Warner got out in front of them.
It would explain why former DOJ-NSD lawyer Michael Atkinson was recommended to become Intelligence Community Inspector General....
And why the SSCI approved.
And why the SSCI approved.
It would explain why ICIG Atkinson participated in the second soft-coup effort.
It explains the unique nature of the interests of Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, the House, the SSCI, the DOJ-NSD... flippin' all of it gets exposed within that answer.
It explains the unique nature of the interests of Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, the House, the SSCI, the DOJ-NSD... flippin' all of it gets exposed within that answer.
Think about it.
That answer explains why (at least 5 or 6) participatory members of the 2016 United States oversight known as the "gang of eight" were united in a covert effort against candidate Trump.
That answer explains why (at least 5 or 6) participatory members of the 2016 United States oversight known as the "gang of eight" were united in a covert effort against candidate Trump.
All of this is downstream from that simple question:
"Did the DOJ have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the FISA application used against U.S. Person Carter Page?"...
"Did the DOJ have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the FISA application used against U.S. Person Carter Page?"...
Why wasn't James Wolfe prosecuted for that leak?
Who was DAG Rod Rosenstein and DC Attorney Jessie Liu protecting?
What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront?
What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront?
How could the United States Dept. of Justice conduct a trial where members of the Gang of Eight were implicated in the activity?
How could the institutions of the United States government survive the publicity of members within the Senate Intelligence Committee colluding with foreign and domestic actors to eliminate the President of the United States?
How could the highest and most widely recognized U.S. media institutions (NYT, WaPo and more) survive exposure within that same trial, to participating in a government effort (receiving leaked classified information) intended to eliminate the presidency of Donald John Trump?
Now do you see the ramifications?
/END
/END
Eyes Wide Open: Four pics/documents that tell *THE* story.
The biggest cover-up in U.S. political history: Read each, don't take my word for it. It's all right here:
The biggest cover-up in U.S. political history: Read each, don't take my word for it. It's all right here:
