Read on Twitter
@DanaRohrabacher met with Julian Assange at the Ecuador Embassy, was shown direct evidence of who actually leaked the DNC emails; it wasn’t Russia. Upon his return he was silenced by the special counsel about revealing information of what was discussed. https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/19/julian-assange-has-physical-proof-russians-didnt-h/
“I knew the one man who could prove that it was all baloney was Assange. So I went to see him in London, and he confirmed for me that the Russians did not give him the DNC emails. He had physical proof of that, and he was going to let me see that and have that, but only once,”
“ I found an agreement so he wouldn’t get arrested when he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy in London,” Mr. Rohrabacher insisted.
There are 3 key take away points here.
1. Assange confirmed and showed physical proof, that Russia didn’t hack the DNC to @DanaRohrabacher.
There are 3 key take away points here.
1. Assange confirmed and showed physical proof, that Russia didn’t hack the DNC to @DanaRohrabacher.
2.Dana found an agreement that Assange wouldn’t get arrested when he leaves the embassy.
3. The most interesting point congressman @DanaRohrabacher has been prevented from discussing the contents of the meetings because of the special counsel.
3. The most interesting point congressman @DanaRohrabacher has been prevented from discussing the contents of the meetings because of the special counsel.
So my biggest question is if there is substantive proof that Russian didn’t hack the DNC why was the congressman being barred from discussing his findings with @realDonaldTrump? According to @WashTimes Dana wasn’t allowed to discuss his finding w @POTUS by the Special Counsel.
If the Special Counsel believed Assange is the key figure to the investigation. Why hasn’t Assange been contacted, or asked to give testimony?
Does Assange’s recent extradition request to the US have to do with exposing the truth or with burying the truth?
Does Assange’s recent extradition request to the US have to do with exposing the truth or with burying the truth?
Lets not forget that the fabricated evidence from Fusion GPS was the road map that the Mueller SC used to investigate Trump and his campaign. Yet when Mueller was questioned about Fusion GPS, he stated Fusion GPS was not within his purview.
I find that very strange since it’s the false and fabricated allegations in the dossier that the Special Counsel used to investigate Trump. Literally every key allegation, were used as a road map to investigate Trump and his campaign.
The point I’m making is if the Special Counsel was a real investigation, and not a weaponized political weapon to take down Trump. Julian Assange would have been the first the witness that the SC would question. Now back to to main point of the thread.
I believe Assange holds the keys to the Russian collusion house of cards( that Russia hacked the DNC.) That is why they have cut off all his communications! Curious the last thing he was investigating before he was disconnected was the British role in the Russian/Trump setup.
Shortly before he was silenced
@JulianAssange was investigating the UK's involvement in what has become known as " #SPYGATE" https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/999341072835850240?s=21
@JulianAssange was investigating the UK's involvement in what has become known as " #SPYGATE" https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/999341072835850240?s=21
So last thing Assange was investigating before all his communications were completely cut off was the British role in spy-gate. Interesting that new evidence is pointing in the direction that Stephen Halper was an informant for the CIA, GCHQ, MI6. https://theintercept.com/2018/05/19/the-fbi-informant-who-monitored-the-trump-campaign-stefan-halper-oversaw-a-cia-spying-operation-in-the-1980-presidential-election/?comments=1
Not only was Assange’s communications completely cut off, but he was shortly arrested afterwards. He is currently in custody, and is in court to be extradited back to the USA. We now also find out Assange was being spied on 24/7 in the Ecuadorian embassy! https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/deep-state-cia-was-spying-on-julian-assange-24-7-in-ecuadors-embassy-in-london-spanish-security-company-was-feeding-the-cia-audio-video/
Assange is an imminent threat to the deep state establishment if he has the evidence that Russia didn’t hack the DNC. Now if you were the CIA what would you do to a person that could destroy the house of cards your lies were built upon?
Something like this? https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/1008365343448936449?s=21
Wouldn’t it be convenient to just frame Assange and lock him up until this whole thing blows over? Until Trump is either removed from office or voted out.
Wouldn’t it be convenient to just frame Assange and lock him up until this whole thing blows over? Until Trump is either removed from office or voted out.
I’m sure the deep state has thought about ways to suicide Assange. I’m sure they’ve thought hard and deep if this happened, it would basically prove everything he has ever said is correct. Would give credibility and light to everything he has done. He would be a Martyr.
Now back to the main point of the thread: Recent revelations show James Comey killed an immunity deal with @JulianAssange because he would show technical evidence that the Russia hacked the DNC narrative was a lie. https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1011444004112818176?s=21
Former congressman @DanaRohrabacher wasn’t the only person to meet with Assange who and was shown evidence that Russia didn’t hack the DNC.
Journalist Ellie Ratner confirms that she did meet with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, and that he did in fact tell her the leaked DNC emails came from inside the DNC ( Seth Rich.) It was not a Russian hack. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/21/important-video-confirms-butowsky-lawsuit-claim-julian-assange-told-ellen-ratner-dnc-emails-received-from-seth-rich-not-a-russian-hack/comment-page-2/
If this information is true and accurate, now bolstered by the video of Ratner, the DOJ claim of a Russian hack –based on assertions by DNC contractor, Crowdstrike– would be entirely false. Additionally the DC murder of Seth Rich would hold a far more alarming motive.
To end this thread here is a video of Julian Assange on Dutch TV. When asked about the October surprise. He states whistleblowers go through significant risk, a 27 year old who worked for the DNC was shot in the back in DC.
The interviewer then states that murder was a robbery. Julian then states NO, our sources take great risks. When asked if Seth Rich was the source, Assange states Wikileaks never reveals its sources.
Too add the overwhelming evidence pointing in the direction that the DNC hack was an internal leak from Seth Rich. Here is a FOIA email from none other than Peter Strozk and Lisa Page. Talking about squashing Seth Rich. You couldn’t even make this up! https://twitter.com/realmattcouch/status/1221256286035238912?s=21
@DawsonSField @drawandstrike @FOOL_NELSON @Shem_Infinite @SaraCarterDC @MariaBartiromo @dbongino @AKA_RealDirty @The_War_Economy @CassandraRules @GreggJarrett @gatewaypundit @SeekerOTL @RealMattCouch @JackPosobiec @Kevin_Shipp @docdhj
Just going to throw this in here to show what a threat to the establishment and deep state @DefendAssange was. https://twitter.com/true_pundit/status/782667602728476672?s=21 https://twitter.com/true_pundit/status/782667602728476672
