On Dec 2-3, 2019, the @WHO held an important meeting called the Global Vaccine Safety Summit. If you thought that robust vaccine safety surveillance has been ongoing for at least the past 60 years, the admissions in this meeting may come as a shock. 

It was revealed in the meeting that the @WHO had no concerns about the fact that "global public health" NEVER CREATED vaccine safety studies and surveillance systems until the "antivax" movement drove down compliance rates and increased vaccine skepticism over the last decade.

While media say that skipping vaccines is based on whiteness, wealth, education, privilege, and conspiracy beliefs, the @WHO knows the truth. The overwhelming driving force behind skipping vaccines is concern that they are not safe for children. Media almost never mention this.

Here we have @ProfHeidiLarson driving home the point: vaccine safety and fear of side effects (what we call vaccine injury) is three times more concerning than any other reasoning behind vaccine "hesitancy." Not conspiracy, not haughtiness, not skin color.

But this meeting did not focus on vaccine safety. It focused on increasing PUBLIC PERCEPTION of vaccine safety. To the @WHO, vaccine safety needs to begin to be monitored in order to restore CONFIDENCE. This is not about making vaccines safer because they cannot be made safer.

The @WHO knows that activists have gotten through to doctors. @ProfHeidiLarson says it's a "HUGE PROBLEM" that doctors are questioning vaccine safety now, and docs can't engage the mothers demanding answers because they only got "1/2 day of vaccine education in med school."

Here the @WHO's @ProfHeidiLarson admits advocates are not spreading "vaccine misinformation" on social media-- but they "seed doubt," and that's a problem. "We have a lot of ambiguity in the safety field," she says. "Build trust so people are willing to PUT UP WITH THE RISK."

Here is @ProfHeidiLarson admitting that the @WHO pushes vaccines so hard because the people behind "global health" have created a "vaccine-dependent population." They know that if the 3rd world stops vaccinating, situations like Samoa happen real quick, and it's THEIR fault.

Skeptical parents are concerned that there are too many infant vaccines injected at once. We are told that there have been numerous studies proving the safety of the current vaccine schedule where a child receives 8 vaccines at once.

Take a listen: there has been no such study.

Dr. Chen's answer referred to the need to create and link databases like America's VSD in order to do the study IN THE FUTURE! But our VSD doesn't even track all vaccines. It only tracks 8 healthcare systems in the whole country.

Vaccine adjuvants are required because without them, the human body quickly tackles and overcomes bacterial and non-live viral vaccines. Various forms of aluminum--a neurotoxin and element that permanently inflames the immune system in many children--is used in infant vaccines.

Future vaccines made with new adjuvants will always be even more dangerous than the already-dangerous aluminum ones. Dr. Friede believes the answer is more CONFIDENCE, not safer adjuvants.

The most shocking admission of all was when Dr. Evans asked if his thinking was correct when he says "adjuvants increase vaccine reactions," as if he doesn't know.

Dr. Friede's answer was that they NEED TO CONDUCT THE STUDIES! With adequate size and appropriate measurement!

Here at the @WHO meeting we have Dr. Kaslow calling pregnant women the "new target population for us in vaccines."

His problem? There are no safety studies for vaccinating pregnant women. It's an off-label use. He'd like to see the studies done SO HIS PROGRAM ISN'T DERAILED.

Finally, we have the @WHO's Chief Scientist @doctorsoumya in a commercial, singing the praises of their vaccine safety surveillance, followed by her admission at the meeting that they don't have those systems and struggle to explain the deaths that get "blown up in the media."

All credit and all glory go to Del Bigtree and his team at @HighWireTalk. Please support their @ICANdecide organization with a $20/month reoccurring donation. https://www.icandecide.org/support-ican/ 

In the meantime...

This

Those in charge of global health are only wanting science that is vaccine program "backbone" science. Fresh, confidence-inspiring science.

The lowly guys asking questions didn't seem to understand that no one wants to uncover the horrors of vaccination in their science.