1/n #SadarPranam @ShashiTharoor ji. Saw this fake table shared by @anubhavsinha & you.I chose to respond to you than former for I donât like talking to bullies.
I have discussed myths abt âHindutva & Hinduismâ in my book #ModiAgain :An Ex-Communistâs Manifestoâ too. (Pg 96-99) https://twitter.com/ShashiTharoor/status/1214754453028364289
I have discussed myths abt âHindutva & Hinduismâ in my book #ModiAgain :An Ex-Communistâs Manifestoâ too. (Pg 96-99) https://twitter.com/ShashiTharoor/status/1214754453028364289
2/n I start of with 1st point & trust me what it says is exactly opposite of truth. Iâm surprised a language expert like you falls on this trap.
Iâll explain #Hinduism & #Hindutva one by one. But before that letâs understand the root word âHinduâ as starter. Read on
Iâll explain #Hinduism & #Hindutva one by one. But before that letâs understand the root word âHinduâ as starter. Read on

3/n Hindu is derived from the Sanskrit word Sindhu, which means "a large body of water", covering "river, ocean".It was used as the name of the Indus river and also referred to its tributaries.
4/n The actual term 'hindu' first occurs as "a Persian geographical term for the people who lived beyond the river Indus (Sanskrit: Sindhu)",more specifically in the 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I.
Ref: Introduction to Hinduism by Gavin Flood,P 6.
Ref: Introduction to Hinduism by Gavin Flood,P 6.
5/n The 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I mentions the province of Hi[n]dush, referring to northwestern India. The people of India were referred to as HinduvÄn (Hindus) and hindavÄ« was used as the adjective for Indian in the 8th century text Chachnama.
6/n Ref: On Hindu, HindustÄn, Hinduism and Hindutva by Arvind Sharma & Numen
Vol. 49, No. 1 (2002), pp. 2-5
The term 'Hindu' in these ancient records is an ethno-geographical term & didnât refer to a religion. There many such references.
Hence, HINDU~INDIAN (check snippets).
Vol. 49, No. 1 (2002), pp. 2-5
The term 'Hindu' in these ancient records is an ethno-geographical term & didnât refer to a religion. There many such references.
Hence, HINDU~INDIAN (check snippets).
7/n Now letâs know suffix -ism a bit. Why was it used or when it became popular?
The first recorded usage of the suffix ism as a separate word in its own right was in 1680. By the 19th century it was being used by Thomas Carlyle to signify a pre-packaged ideology.
The first recorded usage of the suffix ism as a separate word in its own right was in 1680. By the 19th century it was being used by Thomas Carlyle to signify a pre-packaged ideology.
8/n In the USA of the mid 19th century, the phrase "the isms" was used as a collective derogatory term to lump together the radical social reform movements of the day (such as slavery abolitionism, feminism, alcohol prohibitionism, Fourierism, pacifism, early socialism, etc).
9/n It was also added for various spiritual or religious movements considered non-mainstream by the standards of the time (such as Transcendentalism, spiritualism or "spirit rapping", Mormonism, the Oneida movement often accused of "free love", etc.)
10/n @ShashiTharoor sir u must be aware that all the -isms were about unilateral philosophy or idea. But isnât Hindu practice all about plurality?
And as I explained you from 7/n-9/n, do you believe that âHinduâ idea is non-mainstream or just a radical social reform?
And as I explained you from 7/n-9/n, do you believe that âHinduâ idea is non-mainstream or just a radical social reform?
11/n Let me make it even simpler. Take example of 3 very common -isms. I have attached respective images as well.
1)Surrealism
2)Expressionism
3)Cubism
Can you notice, that they come with so distinct appearance. itâs because of the unique philosophy embedded.
1)Surrealism
2)Expressionism
3)Cubism
Can you notice, that they come with so distinct appearance. itâs because of the unique philosophy embedded.
12/n And thatâs where the problem comes when you add â-ismâ to âHinduâ. You canât limit it to singular idea hence in reality âHinduismâ is an oxymoron. Like we canât ever say âArchitecturismâ though âDeconstructivismâ is a type of architecture.
13/n Likewise you can have âShaivismâ, âVaishnavismâ but not âHinduismâ. But we accepted this oxymoron with time as it became popular. Brits never understood the pluralistic Hindu idea & ended up adding -ism as they thought it on par of ârigidâ Abrahmic ideas.
14/n @ShashiTharoor sir did you ever wonder why âIslamâ isnât âIslamismâ or âChristianityâ not âChristianismâ? But why do we have âJudaismâ or âHinduismâ? You know, -ism was always added to practice which seemed inferior or not-mainstream.
15/n If one understands -ism & believes in plurality of âHindusâ then Hinduism can never be âHindu Dharmaâ rather SanÄtana dharma. Hope you get it @ShashiTharoor sir. Now let me even elaborate a bit on SanÄtana dharma.
16/n For that we first need to understand what is SanÄtana dharma. It means eternal order. Like âflow of waterâ. Itâs nature of water to flow & every such order is SanÄtana.
We mustnât confuse âdharmaâ withâreligion.â
We mustnât confuse âdharmaâ withâreligion.â
17/n Religion is institutions while Dharma is the way to strive to be right. Dharma tells to reject institution which shows wrong path.
Dharma signifies behaviours that are considered to be in accord with áčta, the order that makes life and universe possible.
Dharma signifies behaviours that are considered to be in accord with áčta, the order that makes life and universe possible.
18/n It includes duties, rights,laws, conduct, virtues and âright way of livingâ. Eg, âRajadharmaâ
means Kingâs Duty not Religion.
For Bhartiya understanding, Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Buddhism, Islam, Christianity are various Panth which means denominations.
Most fail to get it.
means Kingâs Duty not Religion.
For Bhartiya understanding, Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Buddhism, Islam, Christianity are various Panth which means denominations.
Most fail to get it.
19/n @ShashiTharoor sir,let me summarise what I have said so far in response to ur first point (snippet)
1)âHinduâis anethno-geographic connotation & not religious at all.
2)Hinduism is an oxymoron though we use it for popularity.Often addition of-ism degrades the great âvaluesâ.
1)âHinduâis anethno-geographic connotation & not religious at all.
2)Hinduism is an oxymoron though we use it for popularity.Often addition of-ism degrades the great âvaluesâ.
20/n You have been critical of #Hindutva a big time. Let me throw some light on it.
Hindutva is formed by adding -tva suffix (Pratyay) to Hindu. Now, what do you understand by -tva? In plain language adding -tva (ness) to a noun means :in state of being that noun. Eg. Naritva.
Hindutva is formed by adding -tva suffix (Pratyay) to Hindu. Now, what do you understand by -tva? In plain language adding -tva (ness) to a noun means :in state of being that noun. Eg. Naritva.
21/n The attached image will give better clarity of what -tva means.
So @ShashiTharoor sir, can you please explain how the âstate of being âHindu(Indian)âbe wrong at all.
Who are we to interpret âHinduâper comfort if Darius-I,the first one to use word had defined it other way.
So @ShashiTharoor sir, can you please explain how the âstate of being âHindu(Indian)âbe wrong at all.
Who are we to interpret âHinduâper comfort if Darius-I,the first one to use word had defined it other way.
22/n Is it so that someday in quest to interpret per comfort you will âassign any meaning to any wordâ? Then whatâs the rationale of âconventionsâ & âdictionaryâ if words are to be interpreted per choice? Thatâs not fair sir.
23/n That was the period when Islam was spreading on the power of âswordâ & âqital fi sabilillahâ was common. The Parsis had to take refuge in Hindu Rashtra âBharataâ. They were persecuted the worst as Islam was set to conquer Persia.
Thatâs âHindutvaâ ie âstate of being Hinduâ
Thatâs âHindutvaâ ie âstate of being Hinduâ
24/n References for 23/n
1) http://iranicaonline.org/articles/parsi-communities-i-early-historyâŠ
2 &3) Studies in Parsi history
byHodivala, Shahpurshah Hormasji, p 1-11 https://archive.org/details/studiesinparsihi00hodiuoftâŠ
4) Historia Religionum, Volume 2 Religions of the Present
By G. Widengren P212
1) http://iranicaonline.org/articles/parsi-communities-i-early-historyâŠ
2 &3) Studies in Parsi history
byHodivala, Shahpurshah Hormasji, p 1-11 https://archive.org/details/studiesinparsihi00hodiuoftâŠ
4) Historia Religionum, Volume 2 Religions of the Present
By G. Widengren P212
25/n @ShashiTharoor sir you might have read this book which Iâm quoting.
The persecution was falling like brick bats on the Parsis.
âZoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices
By Mary Boyce P 147-50â
You may read this book in more detail should you wish to understand.
The persecution was falling like brick bats on the Parsis.
âZoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices
By Mary Boyce P 147-50â
You may read this book in more detail should you wish to understand.
26/n Shuprabhat @ShashiTharoor sir. Yesterday I had stopped till point 1. Today Iâm going to further call out remaining points of table shared by you. Please read on. I begin with lie no 2., https://twitter.com/aabhas24/status/1214996859959181312?s=21
27/n @ShashiTharoor sir,none can trace how old is SanÄtana dharma. Can someone trace from when water got the trait to flow. So how can one make a claim that Hinduism( SanÄtana dharma) is thousands years old?
I explained SanÄtana dharma in 16/n & 17/n https://twitter.com/aabhas24/status/1214996985029120000?s=21

28/n As far term Hinduism is concerned,â-ismâ was first time added to âHinduâ around 1830.
(Snippet1)
As per historical record âHindutvaâ was coined in 1892 by Chandranath Basu.
(Snippet-2)
(Snippet1)
As per historical record âHindutvaâ was coined in 1892 by Chandranath Basu.
(Snippet-2)
29/n Source for snippets above:
1)Introduction to Hinduism by Gavin Flood,P 6.
2) The Origins of Religious Violence: An Asian Perspective
By Nicholas F. Gier
So @ShashiTharoor point 2 also demolished.
1)Introduction to Hinduism by Gavin Flood,P 6.
2) The Origins of Religious Violence: An Asian Perspective
By Nicholas F. Gier
So @ShashiTharoor point 2 also demolished.
30/n @ShashiTharoor here is my rebuttal for third point of the table.
How absurd to say âHinduism does not have one but many central texts.â Centre is always one, you donât have multiple centres.
& you know,how contradictory you are with this comparison?
How absurd to say âHinduism does not have one but many central texts.â Centre is always one, you donât have multiple centres.

& you know,how contradictory you are with this comparison?
31/n Iâve already explained that âHindutvaâ is nothing but state of being Hindu. So how can one not follow Hinduism (I use it for popularity) if he is âin state of being Hindu?â
Itâs like saying water is not in âstate of being waterâ though itâs flowing.
How many oxymorons?
Itâs like saying water is not in âstate of being waterâ though itâs flowing.
How many oxymorons?

32/n 31 years before SavarkarâS âHindutva: Who is Hinduâ, âChandranath Basuâ published âHindutva: An Authentic History of Hindusâ in 1892 (snippet-2)
Source: 2) The Origins of Religious Violence: An Asian Perspective
By Nicholas F. Gier
Source: 2) The Origins of Religious Violence: An Asian Perspective
By Nicholas F. Gier
33/n @ShashiTharoor ,how many those who have shared this meme showed courage to stand up for Hindu texts?How many howled PM for gifting âGeetaâ? How many stood up against notion that tried to remove âasto ma...â from KV? It was Hindutva which u blame,stood
https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1091184137820622848?s=20
https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1091184137820622848?s=20
34/n @ShashiTharoor both âHinduismâ & âHindutvaâseems to have been first used in 19th Century (read quoted tweet). Though term Hinduism surely doesnât hold chance to predate but Hindutva at least has chances being a Sanskrit word.
https://twitter.com/aabhas24/status/1215190433992601600?s=21 https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1215190433992601600
https://twitter.com/aabhas24/status/1215190433992601600?s=21 https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1215190433992601600
35/n @harikondabolu even Osama Bin Laden worshipped Allah,so by your logic he should be a good Muslim too.
That apart you mustnât forget âHindutva is state of being Hinduâ. Itâs fluidic. In part too we saved our Dharma through it and also gave refuge.
https://twitter.com/harikondabolu/status/1222908745258323968?s=21 https://twitter.com/harikondabolu/status/1222908745258323968
That apart you mustnât forget âHindutva is state of being Hinduâ. Itâs fluidic. In part too we saved our Dharma through it and also gave refuge.
https://twitter.com/harikondabolu/status/1222908745258323968?s=21 https://twitter.com/harikondabolu/status/1222908745258323968
36/n @harikondabolu as replied in quoted tweet Iâve tried to explain you how important âHindutva ie State of being Hindu isâ. It not only protects but in past too has taken up aggression to defend. You should read this thread from 1/n
https://twitter.com/aabhas24/status/1223087721599496193?s=21 https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1223087721599496193
https://twitter.com/aabhas24/status/1223087721599496193?s=21 https://twitter.com/Aabhas24/status/1223087721599496193
37/n Here @ShashiTharoor is again at it.
This propaganda of abusing Hindutva is very much colonial in nature where one has failed to understand basic of language which forms the two very words âHindutvaâ & âHinduismâ.
I wish I could get a chance to debate on this subject. https://twitter.com/ShashiTharoor/status/1339805842988695554
This propaganda of abusing Hindutva is very much colonial in nature where one has failed to understand basic of language which forms the two very words âHindutvaâ & âHinduismâ.
I wish I could get a chance to debate on this subject. https://twitter.com/ShashiTharoor/status/1339805842988695554