I was looking again at the 1/10/17 leaks. Check this out. So Kavalec forwards an email to Winer about the CNN story early on. But who had emailed the story to Kavalec? Look at the very bottom on the email? A colleague from the British Government? Hmmm.

Shortly after that, a House attorney (works for Hoyer) sent Winer the CNN story, and notes that it concerns the Presidential & Trump briefings, not the underlying allegations (meaning the dossier). Did he know that Winer knew about the dossier? Seems like he did.

And Winer declined to interview with Horowitz. I wonder why. Maybe he’ll have more to say to Durham’s Grand Jury.

Hmmm.

Why does Winer’s assistant, who has a State Department email address, seem to work for a private contractor? Is that normal?

Note the difference in the redactions between these two productions of the same email. The later-produced version redacts an innocuous reference to BHO. Why? Very subjective standards by the redacters.