Read on Twitter
Another thread debunking atheism. This time explaining how atheism cannot have morality.
Despite atheists claiming you can have morality without religion, I will simply point out the ironic logical inconsistencies in asserting such a claim
It'll be a quick and easy refutation.
Despite atheists claiming you can have morality without religion, I will simply point out the ironic logical inconsistencies in asserting such a claim
It'll be a quick and easy refutation.
Morality, just like heaven is a religious concept. It's like an atheist trying to prove angels exist but God doesn't. Angels are creations of God after all.
More intelligent atheists like Friedrich Nietzsche realized this.
Source: "The Twilight of Idols" (1889) Nietzsche
More intelligent atheists like Friedrich Nietzsche realized this.
Source: "The Twilight of Idols" (1889) Nietzsche
Morality i.e good/bad (or right/wrong ; justice/injustice) are defined by God. By definition what good is what God says it is, and vice versa.
Obedience to God's commandments is what is defined as good and disobedience to his commands is defined as bad
The logic is that simple
Obedience to God's commandments is what is defined as good and disobedience to his commands is defined as bad
The logic is that simple
Now when atheists try to separate morality from God they also need to come up with a logical reason. They get their reasoning from classical liberalism, or a variation of John Stuart Mill's harm principle
Source: "On Liberty" (1859) John Stuart Mill & https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-012-9406-7
Source: "On Liberty" (1859) John Stuart Mill & https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10902-012-9406-7
This reasoning can be explained as such:
"Happiness and pleasure should be maximized"
"Do what ever you want as long as you don't harm anyone"
Or as the US Declaration of Independence says
"The pursuit of happiness"
"Happiness and pleasure should be maximized"
"Do what ever you want as long as you don't harm anyone"
Or as the US Declaration of Independence says
"The pursuit of happiness"
The simple refutation to atheism is that atheism itself causes harm and unhappiness
I'm sure you've all seen these mountains of scientific papers on how atheism harms human health, I don't need to show you all of em do I, but here's a example https://twitter.com/DevonShapiro/status/1145064208129810434
I'm sure you've all seen these mountains of scientific papers on how atheism harms human health, I don't need to show you all of em do I, but here's a example https://twitter.com/DevonShapiro/status/1145064208129810434
Wearing hijabs is proven to benefit a woman's mental health, promote body sensitivity, reduce sexual objectification/harassment
Yet atheism in France try to ban hijab, directly harming women. You see the inconsistency.
Sources:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1740144509001041
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0023461
Yet atheism in France try to ban hijab, directly harming women. You see the inconsistency.
Sources:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1740144509001041
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0023461
And that's it, the argument is over, I win again. It's just that easy to refute and debunk atheism. It can be done in minutes.
Even PhD atheist philosophers like Dr. Lars Gule admit this. https://twitter.com/enigmaoftruth1/status/1191857183572549632
Even PhD atheist philosophers like Dr. Lars Gule admit this. https://twitter.com/enigmaoftruth1/status/1191857183572549632
