Though this account is new, I have already engaged with several MRA accounts and have developed a theory that I am testing in this thread.

Hypothesis: MRAs can not explicitly answer questions
Explanation: due to either the redundant nature of the Men’s Rights Activist or just the overall lack of positive personality traits it is difficult for an MRA to argue without being disingenuous. As a result, direct answers to direct challenging questions are sparse.
Examples 1-4
Examples 5-8
Examples 9-12
*ex. 11 is kind of an answer, just nonsensical
Examples 13-16
*ex. 13 subject has become aware of the experiment and is lashing out
**ex. 14 an actual answer, noted for posterity
***ex. 16 partially redacted due to block, evidence clearly suggests another unanswered question
Examples 17-20
Example 21: an actual answer
Example 22: another deflection
Example 23: question answered
Example 24: “disclaimer first” only a disingenuous answer would require a disclaimer
Example 25: deflection
Example 26: an actual answer
Example 27: an answer to a question that was posed in several earlier examples. (Notable)
Example 28: “gotcha”
Example 29: this response further strengthens the theory.
Example 30: Mr. MRA, how do you do what you claim to do?

No comment.
Example 31: Disingenuously making implications and disingenuously avoiding the follow up question
Example 32:
Context: subject claims he can repeat homophobic slurs because he heard them on late night television
Example 33:
Example 34:
Examples 35 and 36:
Example 37:
Example 38:
Example 39:
Example 40: submitted by @UCanRollWithUs
Example 41:
Example 42: a question that should be pretty easy to answer...
Example 43:
Example 44:
Example 45:
Example 46: I don’t know... something about Shakespeare I guess. Definitely the weirdest deflection I’ve seen.
Example 47:
There is a feminist central!

No there isn’t

It’s more real than the patriarchy.

How?

It’s still true. 🙄
Example 48: the secrets of “feminist central” continue to be locked away...
Example 49:
Example 50:
Example 51:
Example 52:
Example 53:
Example 54:
Example 55-59: the subject of the alt-right came up in the thread and this account started asking questions about random comedians. No explanation about relevance.
Example 60: a partial answer

Example 61: a very telling deflection
Example 62-64
Example 65: what tweet are you referring to

Proceeds to explain the entire circumstances around seeing the tweet without actually saying which tweet it was.
Example 66: caught in a lie, refusing to address it, trying to change the subject
Example 67:
I had almost forgotten about this thread. Continuing on with Example 68-70
https://twitter.com/expelincels/status/1258882836305719297?s=21 https://twitter.com/EXPELincels/status/1258882836305719297
Example 71
Example 72 is actually about this thread. It’s like almost an answer but the subject can’t seem to identify a proper target for his idea.
Example 73. A straight answer but a deliberate lie.
Example 74
Example 75
Example 76
Example 77
Example 78
Example 79
Example 80. “All terms are made up in the end”
Example 81 https://twitter.com/crashbampow/status/1289503055986061312?s=21
Example 82. Closer to an answer but definitely a dodge.
Example 83. Just bizarre.
Example 84 and 85. First question is answered but the follow up is not
Example 86.
Example 87
Example 88. Maybe the weirdest one of all. No idea what this response means.
Example 89
Example 90 and 91...
Example 92!
Example 93 is kind of an answer but completely imaginary.
Example 94
Examples 95-98 are all dodging the same question, which oddly enough was “what question?”

This is also an example of MRA petulance which I have made another thread on. This is a fit.
Example 99
Example 100
You can follow @EXPELincels.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: