Though this account is new, I have already engaged with several MRA accounts and have developed a theory that I am testing in this thread.
Hypothesis: MRAs can not explicitly answer questions
Hypothesis: MRAs can not explicitly answer questions
Explanation: due to either the redundant nature of the Men’s Rights Activist or just the overall lack of positive personality traits it is difficult for an MRA to argue without being disingenuous. As a result, direct answers to direct challenging questions are sparse.
Examples 13-16
*ex. 13 subject has become aware of the experiment and is lashing out
**ex. 14 an actual answer, noted for posterity
***ex. 16 partially redacted due to block, evidence clearly suggests another unanswered question
*ex. 13 subject has become aware of the experiment and is lashing out
**ex. 14 an actual answer, noted for posterity
***ex. 16 partially redacted due to block, evidence clearly suggests another unanswered question
Example 23: question answered
Example 24: “disclaimer first” only a disingenuous answer would require a disclaimer
Example 25: deflection
Example 24: “disclaimer first” only a disingenuous answer would require a disclaimer
Example 25: deflection
Example 32:
Context: subject claims he can repeat homophobic slurs because he heard them on late night television
Context: subject claims he can repeat homophobic slurs because he heard them on late night television
Example 40: submitted by @UCanRollWithUs
Example 46: I don’t know... something about Shakespeare I guess. Definitely the weirdest deflection I’ve seen.
Example 47:
There is a feminist central!
No there isn’t
It’s more real than the patriarchy.
How?
It’s still true.
There is a feminist central!
No there isn’t
It’s more real than the patriarchy.
How?
It’s still true.

Example 55-59: the subject of the alt-right came up in the thread and this account started asking questions about random comedians. No explanation about relevance.
Example 65: what tweet are you referring to
Proceeds to explain the entire circumstances around seeing the tweet without actually saying which tweet it was.
Proceeds to explain the entire circumstances around seeing the tweet without actually saying which tweet it was.
I had almost forgotten about this thread. Continuing on with Example 68-70
https://twitter.com/expelincels/status/1258882836305719297?s=21 https://twitter.com/EXPELincels/status/1258882836305719297
https://twitter.com/expelincels/status/1258882836305719297?s=21 https://twitter.com/EXPELincels/status/1258882836305719297
Example 72 is actually about this thread. It’s like almost an answer but the subject can’t seem to identify a proper target for his idea.
Examples 95-98 are all dodging the same question, which oddly enough was “what question?”
This is also an example of MRA petulance which I have made another thread on. This is a fit.
This is also an example of MRA petulance which I have made another thread on. This is a fit.