#fplcommunity

For those debating whether to replace Tammy or not - it really comes down to your team setup on a case by case basis;

If, you do not have a strong bench option, there is good logic to replace Tammy. He's out for one game if not two... (1/7)

...and these are two plum home fixtures for Chelsea to expect decent points from him.

There are also several other teams with two good fixtures next up - and affordable strikers from Tammy's price range to switch to (eg. Ings).

It could even be well worth a -4 to do. (2/7)

If however you have good bench replacement options for the next 2 GWs (as many of us do with Lundstram and co) it's worth holding Tammy if you've already made a transfer, or if you think your bench option has as much points potential as alternative Tammy striker options... (3/7)

...particularly if you have a lot of money tied up in Tammy. A lot of us would have circa 0.8m (8.0m - 7.2m), which is a lot when you may want him back in your team and will have to pay circa 0.6m extra in a week or two to get him. (4/7)

Also think longer term about whether alternative Tammy options will pay off over more than just one Gameweek. Eg. Rashford; great potential as a one-off game against Villa, but then plays a confident Spurs side and is away at City. You may want Tammy back after next GW... (5/7)

For me, I have another fire to rectify, which is a known and definite fire, not subject to change on Monday. So waiting and seeing on Tammy makes more sense, particularly as I have good bench options over next 2 GWs and 0.7m of value tied up in him. (6/7)

Key message: weigh this up in the context of your own team and what will statistically increase your overall points potential most with transfer moves. It's really not one to follow other manager's decisions on.

Good luck for GW14 with whatever you decide! (7/7)