#fplcommunity

For those debating whether to replace Tammy or not - it really comes down to your team setup on a case by case basis;

If, you do not have a strong bench option, there is good logic to replace Tammy. He& #39;s out for one game if not two... (1/7)

...and these are two plum home fixtures for Chelsea to expect decent points from him.

There are also several other teams with two good fixtures next up - and affordable strikers from Tammy& #39;s price range to switch to (eg. Ings).

It could even be well worth a -4 to do. (2/7)

If however you have good bench replacement options for the next 2 GWs (as many of us do with Lundstram and co) it& #39;s worth holding Tammy if you& #39;ve already made a transfer, or if you think your bench option has as much points potential as alternative Tammy striker options... (3/7)

...particularly if you have a lot of money tied up in Tammy. A lot of us would have circa 0.8m (8.0m - 7.2m), which is a lot when you may want him back in your team and will have to pay circa 0.6m extra in a week or two to get him. (4/7)

Also think longer term about whether alternative Tammy options will pay off over more than just one Gameweek. Eg. Rashford; great potential as a one-off game against Villa, but then plays a confident Spurs side and is away at City. You may want Tammy back after next GW... (5/7)

For me, I have another fire to rectify, which is a known and definite fire, not subject to change on Monday. So waiting and seeing on Tammy makes more sense, particularly as I have good bench options over next 2 GWs and 0.7m of value tied up in him. (6/7)

Key message: weigh this up in the context of your own team and what will statistically increase your overall points potential most with transfer moves. It& #39;s really not one to follow other manager& #39;s decisions on.

Good luck for GW14 with whatever you decide! https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👍" title="Thumbs up sign" aria-label="Emoji: Thumbs up sign"> (7/7)