Below:

Bolton's lawyer claiming that the court's ruling in McGahn's case does not apply to officials who advise on national security.

Also below:

THREE TIMES the court said the ruling applies to officials who advise on national security.

#BoltonMustTestify

Bolton's lawyers quote is in this piece by @Axios' @zacharybasu

Note: The court also explains, at length, that the very idea of absolute immunity from testifying is complete made-up fiction.

Bolton's argument for immunity is predicated on that fiction. https://www.axios.com/national-security-officials-mcgahn-ruling-john-bolton-5719a0c9-572b-4906-8be5-e2d1d98b145c.html

Bolton lawyer's claim is the Judiciary Committee told the court McGahn did not cover national security.

But what's more important:

DOJ told the court McGahn's position covered national security. The court said, okay, but that's irrelevant! Immunity does not exist regardless.

Bottom line: According to the court: #BoltonMustTestify

Bolton can wait it out. For that, the court said:

"The official’s defiance...substantially harms the national interest."
"Recalcitrant witnesses actually undermine the broader interests of the People of the United States."