I’ll try to explain nicely: Sexual preference has zero, nada, zilch to do with conservative philosophy, I.e., principles of individual liberty and limited government.

Tradition itself isn’t a conservative tenet if it violates those principles. + https://twitter.com/XplosiveTweets/status/1198807166246887424

It was people who thought the way you do, that “tradition” is what conservatism is meant to conserve, who railed and ultimately fought against abolishing the traditional institution of slavery. You’d have made a great Democrat in 1863, @XplosiveTweets +

Homosexuality does not violate any principle of individual liberty or limited government in any way. So how can you say that a person who subscribes to those principles isn’t a “conservative” because they aren’t attracted to the opposite sex? That makes no sense, @XplosiveTweets+

I can’t expect that you’ve read Locke or Hobbes or much of anything regarding those principles that are the foundation for classical liberalism and conservatism, but I’d encourage you to, @XplosiveTweets. You’ll find nothing re: sexual orientation. Nor should you.

Someone who doesn’t understand these basics doesn’t get to be the gatekeeper to decide who gets to be a conservative, @XplosiveTweets. Hope you’ll challenge your stance introspectively - it’s wrong.