Read on Twitter
OK imagine this scenario:
1) House votes to impeach
2) Senate holds the trial
3) Schiff gets called as a witness
4) Schiff refuses to appear, even if subpoenaed
Because THAT’S how this would go. Schiff will not let himself be under oath & questioned. https://www.theepochtimes.com/adam-schiff-will-be-called-as-a-witness-in-senate-impeachment-trial-graham_3146468.html">https://www.theepochtimes.com/adam-schi...
1) House votes to impeach
2) Senate holds the trial
3) Schiff gets called as a witness
4) Schiff refuses to appear, even if subpoenaed
Because THAT’S how this would go. Schiff will not let himself be under oath & questioned. https://www.theepochtimes.com/adam-schiff-will-be-called-as-a-witness-in-senate-impeachment-trial-graham_3146468.html">https://www.theepochtimes.com/adam-schi...
“Graham also said he wouldn’t let a trial of Trump be based on hearsay evidence alone. A trial would also not be held if the whistleblower doesn’t testify, he said.”
Well there is no way Schiff agrees to either of these conditions.
Well there is no way Schiff agrees to either of these conditions.
And we already know the Fake whistle blower has nothing but hearsay to offer if called to testify in the House hearings.
Schiff is still insisting he does not know the identity of the fake whistle blower.
Schiff is still insisting he does not know the identity of the fake whistle blower.
You know who& #39;ll also be called in to testify if this thing goes to a Senate trial?
The Ukrainian President & also the Foreign Minister. Who both say there was no quid pro quo. https://www.theepochtimes.com/ukraine-foreign-minister-says-us-aid-and-biden-investigations-were-never-linked_3146521.html">https://www.theepochtimes.com/ukraine-f...
The Ukrainian President & also the Foreign Minister. Who both say there was no quid pro quo. https://www.theepochtimes.com/ukraine-foreign-minister-says-us-aid-and-biden-investigations-were-never-linked_3146521.html">https://www.theepochtimes.com/ukraine-f...
Understand this: Schiff will NEVER allow himself to publicly be placed under oath and asked if he knows the identity of the whistleblower or his coordination with said whistleblower.
Schiff will NEVER allow the fake whistleblower to testify in the House - or anywhere else.
Schiff will NEVER allow the fake whistleblower to testify in the House - or anywhere else.
In a Senate trial - which will never happen, but let& #39;s play along - Trump gets to defend himself. He gets to have counsel there to call witnesses. He gets to enter evidence into the record.
And you can bet he& #39;ll be bringing in the OTHER guy who was on the phone.
And you can bet he& #39;ll be bringing in the OTHER guy who was on the phone.
Yes, I& #39;m very well aware of the people out there peddling fantasies about a Romney-led coup in the Senate where he and McConnell - in front of the entire country - decided to flush the entire GOP down the toilet by suddenly stabbing Trump in the back & removing him from office.
I& #39;m dealing in reality here, not fantasy.
Removal from office will never happen because the Senate trial will be a real trial. Trump will have the best lawyers & he& #39;ll call the best witnesses & Schiff& #39;s farce would not stand up to scrutiny.
So understand this:
Removal from office will never happen because the Senate trial will be a real trial. Trump will have the best lawyers & he& #39;ll call the best witnesses & Schiff& #39;s farce would not stand up to scrutiny.
So understand this:
This impeachment sham is all public relations theater about the election next year.
For that reason Schiff will ***NEVER*** allow a Senate trial to happen that would utterly expose & destroy his Trump/Ukraine hoax narrative.
Democrats **NEED** that narrative for the election.
For that reason Schiff will ***NEVER*** allow a Senate trial to happen that would utterly expose & destroy his Trump/Ukraine hoax narrative.
Democrats **NEED** that narrative for the election.
