This is a piece that levies accusations through the coy practice of asking provoking and misleading questions through assumptions. Accordingly, I address the following: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-impeachment-hearings-whistleblower-testify-andy-biggs
Rep. Andy Biggs: Trump impeachment hearings prove that 'whistleblower' must appear and testify
The latest attempt to remove President Trump from office by Democrats rests upon the anonymous complaint of an unidentified government employee.https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-impeachment-hearings-whistleblower-testify-andy-biggs
1. The Whistleblower never met with Chairman Schiff about this matter.
2. The Whistleblower did not receive any assistance from any Member of Congress or Congressional staffer in drafting the complaint.
3. Taking this a step further: no one in Congress (members, staff, or anyone else) ever saw the complaint until it was released to Congress by the Executive Branch.
4. Mark Zaid was NOT on this matter until September 21, 2019, and had nothing to do with the complaint in any way, shape, or form.