2/ If you care abt gender equality (that's you!), it’s time to talk taxes.

f you’re a tax wonk, it’s PAST time to reckon w/gender & racial bias in the tax code & who is (not) at the table.

Keep reading to learn how we
3/ The tax code’s first & best-known purpose is to collect revenue, which supports public investments in our shared priorities.

This function alone makes tax a gender justice issue as priorities like child care, paid leave, & more require lawmakers to invest resources.
4/But its power goes further. The tax code is also a social and political document.
✔️it rewards and incentivizes behavior
✔️It favors certain lifestyles & household structures
✔️The rules it sets can mitigate/exacerbate econ/political inequality

In other words:
5/The tax code reflects & enshrines a vision of society.

Accordingly, this set of reports argues we must harness the tax code’s full potential so that the society it reflects is one ROOTED in gender and racial equity.

https://nwlc.org/resources/gender-and-the-tax-code/

Let's go deeper into each
6/ Here’s the deal: our tax code was written by mostly straight, white, rich men. There wasn’t even a woman on the Sen Finance Committee until 1995!

Unsurprisingly, their biases are baked into our tax code, which means a LOT of tax laws don't work for women & esp women of color
7/ Paper #1 by @ajurowkleiman & @nwlc colleagues Amy Matsui & @estelleromaine examines tax provisions that reflect & enshrine racial/gender biases or outdated assumptions about families & workers - on everything from who is earning income, building wealth, and caregiving.
8/For example, tax code’s “joint filing” system, adopted in 1948, creates a "marriage bonus" for couples w/a main breadwinner (usually a man) & little/no earnings from other spouse. In 1940s, this was not controversial: it encouraged women to leave jobs 4 returning WWII soldiers
Report #1 has a few other doozies.
For one thing, legal expenses to defend against bribery charges can be deducted as a “business expense.”

But the mom paid poverty wages who NEEDS child care to work? Her income doesn't qualify her for the nonrefundable child care tax credit.
11/ Ready to get really angry?
Awards for workplace injuries (likely to be men) are not taxed, but awards for workplace discrimination, including sexual harassment (likely women, ppl of color, & ppl w/disabilities) ARE taxed.
14/ . @katy_milani @stephsterlingdc @SarahHassmer & I explore how a series of trickle-down tax policies interact with historical/structural exclusions of women & people of color, and why a tax agenda should be part of gender justice agenda to rebalance these inequities.
15/ 1st, we discuss how “trickledown” tax cuts fail to deliver on promised econ growth for all.

Example: companies w/high shares of women & people of color in their workforce, used huge windfall from #GOPTaxScam to reward shareholders instead of raising pay for their workers.
16/Starbucks’ workforce is 2/3 women & abt ½ ppl of color. Median pay: $12,754.

In 2018, post-tax law, Starbucks⬆️spending on stock buybacks by 240% to $7.2 BILLION to reward shareholders.

That could have paid for $24,729 pay bump for its 291,000 workers!
Cc @teamcoworker
17/ @nwlc & @rooseveltinst paper also underscores role of taxes in gender &r racial wealth gaps.

Power & wealth beget power & wealth. White man have it. Black & Brown women have been systemically denied opportunities to build it.
18/when our tax code rewards income from wealth over income from work; and when the vast majority of tax subsidies reward those with the highest incomes, those gaps grow.
19/ Our report explains how
1) tax treatment of inherited wealth/preference for income from wealth
2) low effective rates on the rich/breaks for “pass-through” income
3) tax law's treatment of debt

exacerbate pay, power &/or wealth disparities between CEOs & low-paid workers
20/And who is in the low-wage workforce, seeing little to no income growth as CEO pay skyrockets? That’s right, it’s disproportionately women and especially women of color
21/All those jargony tax terms?
“pass-through income”
“carried interest”
“stepped up basis in capital gains”

Don’t worry, we got you covered! This paper explains what they are, why they matter, & how they enable behaviors that hurt women & esp WOC.
23/ We explain how low-income families –disproportionately headed by women & people of color –have limited access to tax subsidies that wealthy families receive AND little support from spending-side basic assistance programs in areas like housing, child care, higher ed & transit
24/ One example: We give billions in tax breaks for vacation & luxury homes through mortgage interest deduction. Yet lawmakers cry ‘deficit’ when it’s time to invest in rental assistance for struggling families. Who is gets hurt by this under-investment in rental asst?....
26/The @nwlc @GCPIEconSec report offers a practical framework for leveraging refundable tax credits for greater equity in the tax code, showing how they can help families on the tax side, while complementing spending side investments & proposals.
27/Here’s the rub: Nowhere does the tax code explicitly say that women shall be treated differently than men, or families of color treated differently than white families. But while the language may be neutral,the IMPACT disadvantages women & people of color in practice. In short
28/Here’s the good news: our tax code didn’t happen by accident. People in power made decisions. We can make different &better decisions. These reports aim to provide research to inform & inspire collective action to build the power to create a tax code that works for ALL of US
30/If you believe in gender justice, join us to fight for tax justice.

If you fight for tax justice, join us to center gender and racial equity in our tax code.

It’s going to take all of us to take back our tax code. #TaxThePatriarchy!
You can follow @mboteach.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: