Read on Twitter
1) HOW JUSTICE THOMAS CAN BANKRUPT THE MSM WITH A SINGLE SCOTUS CASE IN 2020
Since 1964, reporters can make up fake news about a PUBLIC figure with virtually no risk of being sued for DEFAMATION. This thread explores how Justice Thomas will SOLVE this problem for America.
Since 1964, reporters can make up fake news about a PUBLIC figure with virtually no risk of being sued for DEFAMATION. This thread explores how Justice Thomas will SOLVE this problem for America.
3) JUSTICE THOMAS 2019 OPINION
In Feb 2019, Thomas wrote an opinion asking SCOTUS to take a fresh look at NYT vs Sullivan. Currently, fake news reporters can say they felt a story was true from an unnamed source & unless they ADMIT to actual malice, they will not face liability.
In Feb 2019, Thomas wrote an opinion asking SCOTUS to take a fresh look at NYT vs Sullivan. Currently, fake news reporters can say they felt a story was true from an unnamed source & unless they ADMIT to actual malice, they will not face liability.
4) THE COVINGTON CASE
Non public figures like the Covington Students can sue for defamation without having to prove "actual malice". For this reason, the Covington students are able to easily sue the fake news media for labeling them as "racist" which harmed their reputation.
Non public figures like the Covington Students can sue for defamation without having to prove "actual malice". For this reason, the Covington students are able to easily sue the fake news media for labeling them as "racist" which harmed their reputation.
5) JUSTICE ROBERTS RESIGNS
When the FISA report gets released in the near future, Chief Justice John Roberts will be FORCED to resign shortly after because he signed off on every corrupt FISC Judge. Imagine if Justice Thomas became the Chief Justice. Black voters would love it!
When the FISA report gets released in the near future, Chief Justice John Roberts will be FORCED to resign shortly after because he signed off on every corrupt FISC Judge. Imagine if Justice Thomas became the Chief Justice. Black voters would love it!
6) JUSTICE RBG RETIRES
Once FISA drops, it will be obvious Trump gets re-elected. RBG can "retire" for health reasons. The Left will claim Trump cannot appoint a new SCOTUS within 1 year of an election, but our Senate has already said there is no such rule for any re-election.
Once FISA drops, it will be obvious Trump gets re-elected. RBG can "retire" for health reasons. The Left will claim Trump cannot appoint a new SCOTUS within 1 year of an election, but our Senate has already said there is no such rule for any re-election.
7) WE WANT THE LEFT TO USE "ACTUAL MALICE" TO DEFAME THE 2 NEW SCOTUS NOMINEES
Once Roberts & RBG are removed, the Left will take the bait & try to "KAVANAUGH" both of the new nominees. This "actual malice" creates the optics for SCOTUS to change NYT vs Sullivan in early 2020.
Once Roberts & RBG are removed, the Left will take the bait & try to "KAVANAUGH" both of the new nominees. This "actual malice" creates the optics for SCOTUS to change NYT vs Sullivan in early 2020.
8) ENTER TREY GOWDY
On Jan 4, 2020, Trey Gowdy can legally become Trump& #39;s attorney. Imagine if Gowdy then files hundreds of defamation lawsuits against the fake news. Starting with CNN since we have proof of "actual malice" thanks to Jeff Zucker& #39;s Project Veritas recordings.
On Jan 4, 2020, Trey Gowdy can legally become Trump& #39;s attorney. Imagine if Gowdy then files hundreds of defamation lawsuits against the fake news. Starting with CNN since we have proof of "actual malice" thanks to Jeff Zucker& #39;s Project Veritas recordings.
9) DEVIN NUNES VS TWITTER
A Virginia judge let Nunes sue Twitter for "actual malice" in a Virginia Court. This is huge because the court ruled Twitter has legal NEXUS in every state where it has users. Twitter can now be sued for defamation under State Law not just Federal Law.
A Virginia judge let Nunes sue Twitter for "actual malice" in a Virginia Court. This is huge because the court ruled Twitter has legal NEXUS in every state where it has users. Twitter can now be sued for defamation under State Law not just Federal Law.
10) TULSI GABBARD VS GOOGLE
Democratic hopeful Tulsi Gabbard is suing Google for suspending her ads but not the ads of her Democratic opponents. This case is huge because it highlights how Big Tech censors any person they oppose. Any rulings in her case benefit Trump greatly.
Democratic hopeful Tulsi Gabbard is suing Google for suspending her ads but not the ads of her Democratic opponents. This case is huge because it highlights how Big Tech censors any person they oppose. Any rulings in her case benefit Trump greatly.
11) Q #818 (5:5 TIME STAMP)
Q made it very clear that new LIBEL LAWS will be the END of the MSM. Trump is a genius. By allowing the Left to defame the good name of virtually every white hat for years, we can BANKRUPT the MSM once SCOTUS revisits NYT vs Sullivan. Game over.
Q made it very clear that new LIBEL LAWS will be the END of the MSM. Trump is a genius. By allowing the Left to defame the good name of virtually every white hat for years, we can BANKRUPT the MSM once SCOTUS revisits NYT vs Sullivan. Game over.
12) NOW YOU UNDERSTAND TIMING
Arresting [them] before we could sue the MSM for defamation would have been foolish. Once libel laws are changed, every fake news story or data breach that harms any person& #39;s reputation can create a libel lawsuit without needing to prove malice.
![12) NOW YOU UNDERSTAND TIMINGArresting [them] before we could sue the MSM for defamation would have been foolish. Once libel laws are changed, every fake news story or data breach that harms any person& #39;s reputation can create a libel lawsuit without needing to prove malice.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EHNh7f0XUAAYX2x.jpg "12) NOW YOU UNDERSTAND TIMINGArresting [them] before we could sue the MSM for defamation would have been foolish. Once libel laws are changed, every fake news story or data breach that harms any person& #39;s reputation can create a libel lawsuit without needing to prove malice.")
Arresting [them] before we could sue the MSM for defamation would have been foolish. Once libel laws are changed, every fake news story or data breach that harms any person& #39;s reputation can create a libel lawsuit without needing to prove malice.
