Read on Twitter
Don't start here:
Instead, start here (attached) then work backwards toward "Afterwards" :
You are going to get these OFTEN, that will be okay. They are important, you will see later on how they are actually "Nonconformal Transients":
Note: $I will show you how to manage them later. It has to do with non-uniform entanglements density coupled to time steps.
Note: $I will show you how to manage them later. It has to do with non-uniform entanglements density coupled to time steps.
$I know it feels "freaky" at first. Please do not worry about it foor now, hysteresis has an "Envelope" you will merely have to learn how to manage the "Envelope Overlap". It will actually work in your favor much more than you might expect:
$You will want to visualize in terms of periodicity, not pulses. The difference will become apparent as you begin to see how the hysteresis feedback loops overlap in "Generative / Constructive" ways:
Also "Domain Pinning" couple to Barkhausen Effect. You are going to get "kicks / boosts (Barks)" as well as "Hysteresis Drag" artifacts.
DON'T WORRY ABOUT THIS. In net you can use it to create "lulls" in the signal propagation pattern which you can use to your advantage.
DON'T WORRY ABOUT THIS. In net you can use it to create "lulls" in the signal propagation pattern which you can use to your advantage.
WHEREVER POSSIBLE: Avoid technical terms for now, instead use the words: "SMOOSH, STRETCH, MOOSH, THIN, NOT MUCH, TOO MUCH, CLING, DRAG, PUSHY PUSHY, GUSH, GRAB, LONG, ETC" or other childish variants whenever possible:
You are allowed to have more than One Operation happening at the same time at the same point without conflict. Let go of Atomistic / Quantum Dogma's completely. Start with no bias, let the actual experimental results guide you. Even density, $you may let go of that concept too:
If anyone "KNEW IT" it wouldn't be "Unsolved" :
ANYONE who tells $you that $you are wrong has NO BASIS or FOUNDATION of opinion in this matter... There exists no reference standard on this route.
Instead, seek to align with: Explorers, Adventurers, Enthusiasts.
ANYONE who tells $you that $you are wrong has NO BASIS or FOUNDATION of opinion in this matter... There exists no reference standard on this route.
Instead, seek to align with: Explorers, Adventurers, Enthusiasts.
Compressible wavelet fluctuations with periodicity are nearly IMPOSSIBLE to model with non-uniform entanglement helicity. You CANNOT accurately predict Barkhausen Effects (kicks), consider that a "FUN ASPECT" of this. Like an amusement park ride.
If possible, find the child's mind. Release it as much as you can. Allow it to run free. The details will sort themselves out in the aftwaking sums. Less planning, less figuring, more exploring, more experimenting. More errors.
/ EOF
