(thread) How California Turned Blue

Alternate title: California shows the way

California used to be Republican. We gave the nation Nixon and Reagan.

Republican candidates won CA in every presidential election between 1952 and 1988 except one⤵️
2/ Here was one of Wilson’s 1994 reelection campaign ads:


“They keep coming . . .” begins the narrative. It's very Trumpian, almost like Trump modeled his own ads on Pete Wilsons'.

Pete Wilson won the election, helped by voter suppression in California.
3/ As an example of California suppression, polling sites “adversely impacted the ability of limited-English proficient voters to cast an effective and meaningful vote.”
https://gould.usc.edu/students/journals/rlsj/issues/assets/docs/issue_17/09_California_Macro.pdf

In plain talk: Non-English speakers weren't provided language assistances. . .
5/ Chinese were among the first in San Francisco, having built most of the railroads.

Wilson’s signature law, Prop 187 ("Save our State”) denied undocumented persons non-emergency health care, access to schools, etc. It stoked anger against non-whites. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2547004?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
6/ California has a history of that. We owned the Japanese internment camps in WWII.

187 fanned the flames.

Guess who was doing most of the backbreaking work picking crops in the fields? (Hint: They spoke Spanish.) They also paid taxes.

187 kept their children out of school.
7/ Proposition 187 created a stir—and heated arguments.

This was the part of the plot where the subtext became text.

People said things like, “Why should our taxes pay for schools and hospitals for them?"

(Um, maybe because they pay taxes, too? And they do important work?)
8/ I had a friend who taught school in a rural area. Many of her students had parents working the fields. Now they were to be denied access to classrooms, and even the nurses office.

Shocked into action by Proposition 187, liberals and minority communities organized.
9/ Voter drives were organized. Prop. 187 was successfully challenged in the courts. Lawyers formed voter protection orgs.

By 2000, CA was mostly Democratic, because of changing demographics combined with a backlash against the anti-immigration hate stirred up by 187.
11/ GOP lawmakers refused to pass budgets until they got what they wanted.

This was the part of the plot where the party that represents a minority of the population (who used to be the majority) had disproportionate power, and used that power to obstruct.

Sound familiar?
13/ I’ve heard some absurd arguments for how California really turned blue, but I won’t refute them here.

OK, I’ll refute one of them.

One argument is that the supermajority happened because conservatives fled after California started enacting liberal policies.
14/ How silly is that? Liberal policies couldn't happen until AFTER we had a supermajority.

Once we enacted liberal policies, some migration solidified California's majority.

False claim: Workers left CA because it became too expensive.
16/ This CEO didn't like the taxes. (South Carolina has a $7.25 minimum wage).

✔️False claim about how California turned blue, debunked

Here's California now⤵️. Rural, sparsely populated areas are still Republican.
17/ During the 2016 election—while watching Trump’s campaign ads featuring scary people coming over the border—I said, “This is the Pete Wilson 1994 campaign all over again.”

(I also remembered Wilson won)

The U.S. is now at the part of the plot where the subtext becomes text.
19/ Maybe it takes the subtext becoming text for that to happen.

Democrats have always had larger numbers, but were never well organized. Now they’re getting organized.

Only 58% of the eligible voters voted in 2016.
Find those who lean liberal and get them to the polls.
20/ Adriane said⤵️ https://twitter.com/AdrianeZane/status/1136460963228655616
When I saved her tweet, I made an optimistic note to myself: "Maybe the universe is unfolding as it should."

How does the story end?

Look to California.

“History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.” (Attributed to Mark Twain)
https://twitter.com/mjf_dfw/status/1163486693829332992
Good question about why the current GOP didn't learn from CA.

Maybe history rhymes because human nature remains the same.

Psychologists @karen_stenner and @JonHaidt describe what they call the "Authoritarian Dynamic,” which goes like this . . .
. . . A certain percentage (about 1/3 across cultures) have what they call an authoritarian disposition. Those with this disposition prefer sameness and uniformity. Complexity (which includes diversity) scares them.

Important: they aren't dangerous or “racist” until . . .
. . . stirred up by demagogues like Trump (and Wilson) who deliberately arouse their fears.

As liberal democracy expands it naturally grows more diverse.

Growing diversity makes the situation ripe for a demagogue to arouse the fears of those with authoritarian dispositions. . .
. . . the authors conclude that the current right wing fervor isn't a momentary madness but a feature of liberal democracy. There will always be people who are not comfortable growing diversity.

We'll get out of this crisis by outvoting them. . .
. . . the long term solution is to find a way to deal more effectively with the authoritarians in our midsts to make them less dangerous.

I wonder if one way to begin is to view those being aroused to anger as victims. The evil ones are the demagogues stirring them up.
Forgot to include my source for The Authoritarian Dynamic.

I rely on the essay, “Authoritarianism is Not a Momentary Madness, but an Eternal Dynamic within Liberal Democracies,” in this volume⤵️

@karen_stenner also has a book called "The Authoritarian Dynamic."
You can follow @Teri_Kanefield.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: