Read on Twitter
1
Bilfinger Thread
B O’s notes (see pic):
Bilfinger
NPA gment (NPA agreement) on German Co that owes $
An NPA or Non Prosecution Agreement is agreement w/ DOJ to stop litigation
A DPA, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, halts it w/ an “arrangement”
(*see Yates Memo below #11)
Bilfinger Thread
B O’s notes (see pic):
Bilfinger
NPA gment (NPA agreement) on German Co that owes $
An NPA or Non Prosecution Agreement is agreement w/ DOJ to stop litigation
A DPA, Deferred Prosecution Agreement, halts it w/ an “arrangement”
(*see Yates Memo below #11)
2
Bilfinger found there were claims of FIFA bribes out of Oman.
From what I could find, and it wasn’t much, the man in charge of Oman for Bilfinger completely disappeared.
The ‘head of investigations’, who was hired for compliance with DPR, was Maria Alix von Sachsen-Meiningen
Bilfinger found there were claims of FIFA bribes out of Oman.
From what I could find, and it wasn’t much, the man in charge of Oman for Bilfinger completely disappeared.
The ‘head of investigations’, who was hired for compliance with DPR, was Maria Alix von Sachsen-Meiningen
3
On her way to Oman she stopped in Abu Dhabi to meet with colleague. This individual served her tea which she believes was poisoned, as she was extremely ill & hallucinating for three days.
She never made it to Oman and was fired in early March 2017. http://Archive.is/3coiv
On her way to Oman she stopped in Abu Dhabi to meet with colleague. This individual served her tea which she believes was poisoned, as she was extremely ill & hallucinating for three days.
She never made it to Oman and was fired in early March 2017. http://Archive.is/3coiv
4
Meiningen had hired Steel/Orbis to “investigate” for Bilfinger at some point in 2016, in relation to the compliance with DOJ for the DPA (self reporting - Yates Memo) in Nigerian bribery case.
I found this here http://Archive.is/NLTNa
But could not find confirmation until...
Meiningen had hired Steel/Orbis to “investigate” for Bilfinger at some point in 2016, in relation to the compliance with DOJ for the DPA (self reporting - Yates Memo) in Nigerian bribery case.
I found this here http://Archive.is/NLTNa
But could not find confirmation until...
5.
... I looked in the logs of edited Wikipedia Pages - see version that includes lawsuit here http://Archive.is/iqzZO
... I looked in the logs of edited Wikipedia Pages - see version that includes lawsuit here
http://Archive.is/iqzZO
6
For those not interested in looking through all of that, here is a screenshot with pertinent section highlighted.
For those not interested in looking through all of that, here is a screenshot with pertinent section highlighted.
7
So Orh’s notes imply they will use a German Co (likely that needs) NPA that owes a lot of
.
He names Bilfinger.
Bilfinger is connected to Steel - paying him (or they are supposed to be paying him) to investigate as part of compliance w/ USDOJ DPA.
So Orh’s notes imply they will use a German Co (likely that needs) NPA that owes a lot of
.He names Bilfinger.
Bilfinger is connected to Steel - paying him (or they are supposed to be paying him) to investigate as part of compliance w/ USDOJ DPA.
8
Interestingly enough on Dec 9th 2018 Bilfinger put put a press release stating that they had concluded their DPA with DOJ.
See here
http://archive.is/43iuU
And for more detail see http://archive.is/IQGbZ
Interestingly enough on Dec 9th 2018 Bilfinger put put a press release stating that they had concluded their DPA with DOJ.
See here
http://archive.is/43iuU And for more detail see
http://archive.is/IQGbZ
9
This is how the DOJ/shady IC leverage companies, whom the DOJ put in impossible position (Yates Memo), to pay for nefarious activities so the companies can get out of an impossible legal peril with US DOJ.
This is how the DOJ/shady IC leverage companies, whom the DOJ put in impossible position (Yates Memo), to pay for nefarious activities so the companies can get out of an impossible legal peril with US DOJ.
10
The Yates Memo is impossible to comply with. It gives the DOJ way too much power.
How dirty is Yates?
The Yates Memo is impossible to comply with. It gives the DOJ way too much power.
How dirty is Yates?
11
As per http://www.swlaw.com/blog/white-collar-defense/2016/07/15/the-yates-memo-ten-months-later-what-we-know-and-what-to-do/
The Yates Memo in 2015 made significantg changes to DOJ's NPA/DPA's.
"The most striking change dictated by the Yates Memo is the all-or-nothing nature of cooperation credit.
(Cont)
As per http://www.swlaw.com/blog/white-collar-defense/2016/07/15/the-yates-memo-ten-months-later-what-we-know-and-what-to-do/
The Yates Memo in 2015 made significantg changes to DOJ's NPA/DPA's.
"The most striking change dictated by the Yates Memo is the all-or-nothing nature of cooperation credit.
(Cont)
12.
That is, a corporation is now expected to “identify all individuals involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue . . . and provide to the Department all facts relating to that misconduct.” From now on, given the growing prev
That is, a corporation is now expected to “identify all individuals involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue . . . and provide to the Department all facts relating to that misconduct.” From now on, given the growing prev
13
companies will be required to continue this same level of cooperation as a term of any settlement or plea agreement. Indeed, according to Yates," "A company’s failure to continue cooperating against individuals will be considered a material breach of the agreement and
companies will be required to continue this same level of cooperation as a term of any settlement or plea agreement. Indeed, according to Yates," "A company’s failure to continue cooperating against individuals will be considered a material breach of the agreement and
14
grounds for revocation or stipulated penalties."
"..how the attorney-client privilege will apply. Now that DOJ requires “all information,” it may be more difficult for a corporation to maintain the privilege while at the same time disclosing the quantum of information
grounds for revocation or stipulated penalties."
"..how the attorney-client privilege will apply. Now that DOJ requires “all information,” it may be more difficult for a corporation to maintain the privilege while at the same time disclosing the quantum of information
15.
demanded by the government. Even if a corporation is only disclosing “facts” to the government in the course of an investigation, it may effectively have to waive the privilege, at least partially."
demanded by the government. Even if a corporation is only disclosing “facts” to the government in the course of an investigation, it may effectively have to waive the privilege, at least partially."
16
Rod Rosenstein reversed the Yates Memo Nov 28th 2018.
Interesting that he reversed it when he realized he’d be leaving the DOJ. That power is great if you have control.
*The Yates Memo was key to getting these Co’s to play ball.
Taking a break.
Next - Prevazon.
Rod Rosenstein reversed the Yates Memo Nov 28th 2018.
Interesting that he reversed it when he realized he’d be leaving the DOJ. That power is great if you have control.
*The Yates Memo was key to getting these Co’s to play ball.
Taking a break.
Next - Prevazon.
For those interested in Prevazon/ Katsyv links check this thread out.. enjoy 
. @2xwide_dreaming https://twitter.com/heathertappel/status/1106315929145741312?s=21
. @2xwide_dreaming https://twitter.com/heathertappel/status/1106315929145741312?s=21
