Read on Twitter
I have been asking myself, what, precisely, is the dark enlightenment? As with most names of ideas in our strange little corner of the world, the name has a certain cringey edgelordy quality, much like the words âcringeyâ and âedgelordyâ
On top of that itâs an oxymoron, made possible only by the fact that the word âenlightenmentâ has lost all metaphorical valence. But nonetheless it captures something important
The enlightenment thinkers were theorists, and to take some license, the people who put their ideas into practice, men such as Robespierre and Jefferson, were engineers https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1025738936948150275">https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/...
For this reason I think itâs fair to say that the enlightenment, imagined as the triumph of âreasonâ over âreligionâ, can be compressed into the French slogan âliberty, equality, fraternity, or death.â https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1031893387819905025">https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/...
That it took centuries for the disease to become terminal does not detract from the realization that death was always part of the package, and not the good kind of death, which is the death of your enemies
It is an accident that would be funny if it were not so tragic that the development of scientific understanding has been coupled and conflated with this perverse cult of atheism and death
Most of the greatest discoveries of science have been made by Christians, in large part due to a Christian eagerness to study and understand the material world as one would study the word of God, because creation is in fact one of His works
The accident happened I think because the critical mass of capital accumulation that triggered a phase shift into industrial society came at exactly the same time these ideas were experiencing their popularity
Alternatively perhaps, via Marx, material conditions precede philosophical movements. In the same way feminism was a consequence of contraceptives and antibiotics and automatic dishwashers https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1029364216187084800">https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/...
If this is true then the Dark Enlightenment also springs from the situation in which we now find ourselves, but regardless of that...
From the study of sexual behavior we learn about the inception of paraphilia in males, we learn about two substantially different etiologies of paraphilia. âCuedâ interest is innate and biological, and emerges slowly over the course of puberty and has as its object female anatomy
âUncued interestâ, in contrast, develops in a single spectacular instant, when the male confuses a stimulus which is incidentally present at the time of first ejaculation as having sexual puissance, similar to the way baby birds imprint on their mothers
If I may call the industrial revolution a kind of technocapital orgasm, we may draw an obvious uncomfortable analogy to try to understand the western fetish for liberty and equality, fetishes that are entirely contingent, as the mere existence of Chinese society illustrates
I learned a most horrific story from reading about sexual behavior; a Sri Lankan boy named Chaminda whose first ejaculation was self-induced while the ants from a toy ant farm walked all over his legs, incepting a lifelong erotic desire to have insects crawl on his skin
Lyotard gave an account of the machinations of capital upon the human libido, (regrettably âcommodity fetishismâ is not intended in a sexual sense) but from the perspective of capital itself, HUMANISM is the embarrassing paraphilia, the love of crawling ants
And in a similar way, it happens gradually during his intellectual pubescence that the western man develops a fetish for liberté, egalité, & la mort. Like other cued interests it is innate, not to the man in this case but to our society, in our memetic dna
For those who have followed me for a while you already know that I consider truth to be downstream of power, not in the absolute sense, but the truth of human social relations is no physical constant, it is voluptuous and serpentine
The intertwined projects of the rightist today are 1) the destruction and defamation of enlightenment values 2) to construct a superior and above all SUSTAINABLE replacement, and 3) to accumulate enough power, in the form of capital, to drive the noble refactoring of society
The truth we may not like is that character of the people who rule society is more important than the ideology they hold, and even such repugnant ideas as liberté and egalité can be overcome by the virtue of the founding stock of America, for example
The failure mode of ideology is the same as the failure mode of every paraphilia; it retards reproduction. The culmination of enlightenment ideas is to produce a ruling elite which is incapable of copying itself into the future, effectively castrating all good people
Paraphilia and all other forms of contraception are special cases of Goodhartâs Law, so our new values must take special care to encode OUR understanding of success, and not its proxies https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/status/1047844190741135360">https://twitter.com/0x49fa98/...
We tentatively propose as dark enlightenment values:
HIERARCHY,
(against equality)
BENEVOLENT CONTROL,
(against liberty)
and ETERNITY
(for fraternity is immanent and we yearn more ardently for the permanent)
HIERARCHY,
(against equality)
BENEVOLENT CONTROL,
(against liberty)
and ETERNITY
(for fraternity is immanent and we yearn more ardently for the permanent)
Great follow up
https://twitter.com/tomxhart/status/1059423170749435905">https://twitter.com/tomxhart/...
https://twitter.com/tomxhart/status/1059423170749435905">https://twitter.com/tomxhart/...
