Read on Twitter
There are other, more substantive concerns to focus on as the Kavanaugh show hearings start today, but I'm particularly struck that to be a Trump Supreme Court nominee is evidently first and foremost to be a sycophantic toady. #TrumpJudges 1/
Neil Gorsuch went out of his way to tell Trump that his speech to Congress, which addressed several matters likely to come before the Supreme Court, was "magnificent"—apparently to reassure Trump of his loyalty when Trump started to worry about that. 2/ https://twitter.com/kalhan/status/943171763936034818
In fact, Gorsuch went beyond praising the speech itself to "congratulate" Trump for the "great start" to his presidency—a "start" full of things that already were being challenged in federal court at the time. 3/ https://twitter.com/kalhan/status/943183592053764097
And now we have Brett Kavanaugh, who blatantly lied to the world on live TV in *the very first words* he uttered after Trump picked him—making this ridiculous assertion (meaning, worthy of ridicule) in order to suck up to his patron. 4/ https://twitter.com/greenhousenyt/status/1016855824189313024
(Also increasingly seems likely, by the way, that Kavanaugh lied under oath to the Senate during his previous confirmation hearing, when he was nominated to serve on the DC Circuit.) 5/ https://twitter.com/thedailybeast/status/1035291096660758528
Needless to say, the judiciary should not be packed with flunkies who would fit right in at a cabinet meeting whose only agenda item is showering Dear Leader with hyperbolic praise. 6/
There are, of course, political regimes in the world where people who brown nose rulers to obtain greater judicial prestige and power, as Gorsuch and Kavanaugh have done, would fit right into the judiciary as committed loyalists. 7/ https://twitter.com/sarahkendzior/status/1029046453480644608
Under those kinds of regimes, judges whose loyalty has been assured have often proceeded to play significant roles in further entrenching the power and control of those regimes, and in undermining representative institutions. 8/ https://ssrn.com/abstract=2087116
Those situations are not identical to the US, but when a country that has been stably democratic starts to evolve in more authoritarian directions, we should pay close attention even to the more subtle ways in which the judiciary can be manipulated. 9/ https://www.jstor.org/stable/41349660
I certainly don't expect judges or other public officials to be saints. And again, there are other, more substantive concerns about Kavanaugh's record that demand greater scrutiny too, as @NAACP_LDF has documented in detail. 10/ https://twitter.com/NAACP_LDF/status/1035198506317897728
But Republican apparatchiks like @robportman should spare us their insistence that these #TrumpJudges have exhibited "great character," when they've revealed rather different qualities in the nomination process itself for all to see. 11/ https://twitter.com/kalhan/status/1036775427023486976
Although hey, he's a great carpool dad and gives clerkships to kids of prominent law professors, so NBD why not hand him massive, largely unchecked judicial power for the next 30-40 years based on those "character" references. #FFS 12/ https://twitter.com/kalhan/status/1018214839687241728
When a president openly seeks to manipulate DOJ to shield cronies from prosecution, efforts to manage courts won't be far behind. In fact, that process already has been long underway. Sadly, GOP senators are too complicit either to see that or care. 13/ https://twitter.com/ssamcham/status/1036740381289992192
