#Peer

I'm reminded of how flawed I see the current peer review cycle.A: Look at B.C: Hey, A reported something.B: Hey, A and C are reporting something. It must be true.A:

SunShang 🇪🇺🇮🇪

Provide peer reviewed data and I will consider it.Otherwise, its no different than being told I am stupid for not considering the existence of pixies that live up my arse.Provide

Richard_D_Riley

Seeing a few comments suggesting peer review should be abandoned as it is takes too long or still misses things. It is not perfect BUT I can’t think of a

Jake M. Grumbach

I'm in my first year on the tenure track. I went back and checked, and I've done at least 60 peer reviews in my career (could be more).I know I

It’s been interesting to see how much of an impact peer pressure and herd mentality has on a student’s academics. And I’m not talking peer pressure to do drugs and

Sarah Salviander

sarahsalviander

Here's your periodic reminder that peer review isn't intellectual magic.It's 1 editor and 1 colleague reading your paper and checking for:relevanceclear objectivesgood methodologyproperly reported resultscoherent discussionrefer

Chris Carroll MD

Recently, I’ve seen lots of posts of papers published on preprint servers. So it might be a good time to review what papers on preprint servers are (and what they

I don't understand why CS conferences rely on a peer review system in which real revision is not possible. At @NeurIPSConf for example, author responses are limited to 1 page

YFS Access Centre

YFSAccessCentre

There is no Mad and Mentally Ill or Physical Disability Peer Support Chat today, due to Reading Week. Instead, there will be a casual discussion space on Zoom at the

As a journal editor, I have just checked the stats for 10 papers I am handling. 68 review invites sent 13 accepted32 declined23 no response. Finding reviewers is getting harder

I was street homeless on & off for a year. I then lived in a homeless shelter for SEVEN F'N YEARS! In the 08 crash after I lost my marketing

So @jamesheathers' ruckus (ruckus-maker that he is) about $450 for peer reviewing seems to resonate with reviewers (cf @450Movement).I guess it's implicit in ppl's arguments around this, but what I'm

ꜱᴄɪᴇɴᴄᴇ ɴᴏᴛ ᴅᴏɢᴍᴀ™ 🖖🏿🔬🌱🌊 🇨🇦

ScienceNotDogma

#Climate_Ed Anyone is WELCOME to COPY my climate science tweets to help SUPPORT the evidence of manmade climate change! I've listed 35+ in this /thread!I'm here to push back against

Let’s talk about improvising on the spot in our classes. Yesterday, I had to move an in-person class of 16 students online. I had the tool—Zoom—and a permanent class link

Dr Lidiya Angelova - Censored by LinkedIn and WHO

Tip how to end #covid19craze:1)Ask your government healtcare representatives about peer reviewed scientific evidence that #lockdowns, #masks and vaccine will stop the #coronavirus.Don't accept WHO as source ask about peer

I can answer this one. The study is not a peer reviewed or from a major university. It’s a textbook example of a dodgy source. Let me explain.https://twitter.com/naomirwolf/status/1383218165165936643 It was