#CONSTITUTION

Christopher J. Lee

joonhai

Short thread re: Amy Coney Barrett. The US Constitution is a COLONIAL document: written by colonists, written under conditions of colonialism. Despite its surface claims, "originalism" strikes me as anti-historicist

Criminal law

CrimeJuris

Taking a break from our everyday conversations on criminal law, on the eve of 47th anniversary of the legendary case titled as #KeshavanandaBharati, let us visit few interesting aspects of

auklegal

auklegal1

LEGAL LESSONS LEARNT FROM THE CASE OF UDE JONES UDEOGU V FRN & 2 ORS. #Thread The Supreme Court decided in our favour on the appeal arising from the case

Tycoon

clemomsanii

Kenya is a Trial & Error country [Thread] In 2002 when everyone was tied with Moi's regime, 2 large communities championed for Uhuru Kenyatta who was defeated by Mwai Kibaki

Ring Master Rattle

RingMasterRa33

You know how all these states (Governors mostly) are making all kinds of ridiculous rules and restrictions around COVID-19 that are completely UNENFORCEABLE? Why would they do this (reducing their

M. Nageswara Rao IPS(R)

MNageswarRaoIPS

Story of Project Abrahamisation of Hindu Civilization1.Deny Hindus their knowledge2.Vilify Hinduism as collection of superstitions3.Abrahamise Education4.Abrahamise Media & Entertainment5.Shame Hindus about their identity6.Bereft of glu

Seth Cotlar

SethCotlar

[Stares in historian.]https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1316003676918513664 Has Amy Coney Barrett ever read interpretations of the constitution from, say, 1910? Or 1850? Does she think those past jurists just got the Constitution wrong

Somchai

adfilluz

This is what you said earlier so am I or are you contradicting Brunei's constitution, saying indigenous people not considered Bruneians? *non-citizens of Brunei

Holly Brewer

earlymodjustice

Question for @TheGNapp and @JRakove and @dorfonlaw . I know it says in Art III Sect 1 of the Constitution that judges “will hold their offices during good behavior” which

Anthony Sanders

IJSanders

There’s an aspect to expansive readings of the Commerce Clause that I’ve never really seen explored (I may have missed it), & that I don’t see how defenders of Wickard

Gautam Bhatia

gautambhatia88

Today, there were a lot of theatrics at the Supreme Court. This drama distracts from the real issue. The actions of the present and previous Chief Justices, and the impact

Jason Johnson

DrJasonJohnson

If the nominees are simply allowed to lie during hearings, even when the lie is easily proven with documents, recordings or witnesses, then what is the point? #SCOTUShearings If #BidenHarris2020

Leo Watkins

leowatkins91

Saying what Momentum *should* do is all very well, but there has to be fit between organisational form and function. Without good ideas on what *form* best allows Momentum to

Constitution Unit

ConUnit_UCL

HUGE defeat in the House of Lords on the #InternalMarketBill - we believe the biggest since Lords reform in 1999395 peers opposed the government, just 169 supported, a margin of

イザ 🎃

Izariez

IT'S OFFICIAL NOW: CHILE WILL CHANGE ITS CONSTITUTION, WE REALLY SAY FUCK RICH PEOPLE TONIGHT!!!! said* I hate English Anyway if you don't know why this is a big

𝑅𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑇ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠

MrMeritology

Well actually, Tocqueville didn't say that@IvankaTrump @DavidRivkin @WSJopinion 1/6 Here's link to OpEd that misquotes Tocqueville "This Impeachment Subverts the Courts", WSJ @WSJopinion Sat, 10/26/2019, by @DavidRivkin and Elizabet