#Criterion

Kevin Bass, MS

kevinnbass

How to determine who is a legitimate science-based health expert and who is not.A simple method, a single criterion.A thread. Many popular health experts claim to be science-based. They will

Nikhil Jois

nikhiljoisr

Notes from a 'Selling Value/SaaS sales' conversation workshop conducted by @ku1deep and moderated by @sahilk on @SmolCoach (Disclaimer: errors and ambiguities are mine. The conversation was amazing. This is an

Simon Abrams

simonsaybrams

Devastated to hear about the death of Nobuhiko Obayashi, whose work was consistently championed by the good folks @japansociety, who, in addition to screening his older titles, also screened his

Christopher Chabris

cfchabris

The studies claiming GRE isn’t a valid predictor were all small (even just one department) and suffered from selection and range restriction issues and probably shouldn’t have been published. Kuncel’s

10-K Diver

10kdiver

1) Get a cup of coffee. In this thread, I'm going to walk you through "The Kelly Criterion". 2) In 1956, John Kelly published a paper titled "A New Interpretation

Tom Moultrie

tomtom_m

Another thing. Both @Presidency_ZA and the Minister of Health have suggested that ‘hotspots’ will remain so declared until they have fewer than 5 active cases per 100 000 population. What

10-K Diver

10kdiver

4) The approach is easiest to understand with an example. I'll keep it as realistic as possible: Imagine that you walk into an antique store one day. Due to the

Joe Ballard

JoePBallard

So, the #CSP24 decided today to amend the CWC's Annex on Chemicals, by adding the so-called novichok chemicals to Schedule 1. But what does this mean? 1/7 It doesn't mean

MMA-AI.com 📈🤝💸 100% Datadriven Bets & Unitsizes

MMAAIcom1

Picking Winners or Betting Value? ---Both is right!A popular question and the anwser, i am pretty sure, is simple:1) Focus on value first.2) Manage risk by picking winners second.i.e: Balance

Akash Gautam

akash_vaani

The kind of women who i got attracted to during my growing up years:- -A Thread 1) Who definitely did not meet the traditional baby doll + beauty queen criterion.

Ian Hussey

ianhussey

Speaking only for myself and not my coauthors, this replication project taught me more about the behaviour of researchers and their beliefs than it did about the effect being studied.

George Peretz QC

GeorgePeretzQC

When @thetimes allows someone like @NigelBiggar, who has no obvious legal expertise, to sound off on human rights law, it would be worth getting it checked by someone who can

Peyman Milanfar

docmilanfar

1/4 It may come as a surprise to some that Rayleigh's limit to resolution is just a rule of thumb - not a physical law:"two point sources are regarded as

elisa freschi

elisa_freschi

Again on the epistemology and ontology of #absence (#abhāva). The author (Helen Beebee) does not want to accept an ontological status of absences and therefore defends the seemingly counter-intuitive view

Adam Drosin

adamdrosin

Subscribed to Criterion Channel. Here's what's been going on: Disney+ Interlude HBO Interlude -“Wow, that song with the childrens choir is really haunting and unsettling.

woke capital investment advisor machine

golikehellmachi

if you want to see how the horseshoe works, check out how many reactionary online leftists in this thread have pop cultural complaints that are indistinguishable from your average hard