I think you might fundamentally misunderstand how charity law works, and the Equality Act 2010 to boot. Which is a touch alarming.

It is perfectly legitimate for any charity not to be "inclusive of marginalised groups" because it depends on its purpose, intentions, etc 1/5 https://twitter.com/sarahvibert82/status/1384928002765688834">https://twitter.com/sarahvibe...

The excellent https://www.jewishcare.org"> https://www.jewishcare.org  provides services targeted at Jewish communities. The important https://www.freedomcharity.org.uk/ ">https://www.freedomcharity.org.uk/">... focuses on preventing FGM and supporting those at risk and victims of it. https://www.rsbc.org.uk/ ">https://www.rsbc.org.uk/">... is involved with blind children & young people 2/5

And there are charities not focused on people at all - those which maintain structures, or provide animal sanctuaries, etc.

3/5

I bet you don& #39;t really think that all charities should be doing all the things for all the people and all the marginalised groups. Because that would be daft. It& #39;s not possible for all charities to do everything. Obviously. 4/5

So, perhaps you should think about your dubious assertion about "marginalised groups" because it& #39;s not possible, not true, entirely impractical, and makes it appear you are substituting virtue-signalling for thought. 5/5