>>> https://twitter.com/NYTnickc/status/1265392527630372864">https://twitter.com/NYTnickc/...

Anybody else think Twitter didn& #39;t go far enough to explicitly say Trump& #39;s voter-fraud tweets are inaccurate and are being fact-checked? I mean, "Get the facts about mail-in ballots" doesn& #39;t actually and directly say "Hey! We& #39;re fact-checking this inaccurate claim."

Full disclosure, I work a second job outside of journalism b/c, esp. right now when I don& #39;t have a news outlet to write for, journalism doesn& #39;t fully pay my bills. My second job, usually is UX copywriting, and I& #39;d NEVER write UX copy as wishy-washy as Twitter& #39;s fact-check link.

And, no this thread is not political or biased – so I hope nobody thinks that. I& #39;m merely stating, as a journalist that tries to always be objective and report facts, that Twitter& #39;s fact-check link wordage (copy) is NOT clear enough for Twitter users. /END